Skip to content

B.C. judge orders Canada's last pro-Palestine university encampment dismantled

Protesters are given 72 hours to clear the encampment
palestine-6-edited
Protestors at the Palestine solidarity encampment relax in the sun an hour after the deadline passed that VIU gave to vacate the encampment on July 15.

After a three-day civil hearing, a judge has ordered the removal of the Palestine solidarity encampment at Vancouver Island University.

Justice Michael Stephens delivered his decision on the civil case on Thursday, Aug. 15 at the law court in Vancouver, calling VIU's original request "over-broad," but agreed to an interim injunction for 150 days on the grass quad area, where the encampment currently resides.

VIU’s encampment, which recently passed 100 days, is Canada’s last university solidarity encampment for Palestine amid the ongoing global conflict.

"VIU has a strong case based on the common law of trespass and the defendants do not have a strong argument in defence," Stephens said. 

The over-broad nature stems from a part of the order requested, a curfew across the entire campus from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., that would only exclude students going to and from dormitories. 

“There is no evidence before me of an encampment involving the defendants other than on the grass quad area, nor does VIU’s evidence complain of conduct of the defendants from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. other than the overnight camping in the encampment.” 

He pointed out that the university’s own library closes at midnight, which would take place an hour after the curfew would take effect.

“One of the representative defendants deposes that, quoted, ‘it’s common that I see students gathered on and using the campus after 11 p.m. and early in the morning.’ ‘Lots of people from the community use the stairs on campus running and training before 7 a.m.’”

Stephens also rejected VIU's request to retrieve funds from the protesters and allow police enforcement terms. 

“The defendants include VIU students, among others, and I am not satisfied police enforcement terms are necessary at this time noting there is no evidence that it would be unlikely that the injunction would otherwise be complied with without enforcement terms.”

The defence’s argument, that the Charter applies to the university, where protesters have a right of free expression was also rejected. 

Stephens said he had strong doubts about the strength of the defendants' argument applying to VIU.

"The Charter may apply to an organization if the organization is part of the apparatus of government or if the organization is implementing a specific government program or policy…,” Stephens explained. “VIU is a special purpose teaching university, however the university is not statutorily designated to be, for all purposes, an agent of the government. Instead section 48 of the University Act signals independence from the minister.”

Per the interim injunction, protesters have 72 hours to clear the encampment.

In a statement, VIU said that while they “respect and support the right to peaceful protest and diverse viewpoints,” the court order “ensures that the campus quad is returned to the entire community and prevents any individual group from occupying a shared space for extended periods of time to promote a single perspective.”

“We sincerely hope those in the encampment comply with the court order and vacate the quad before the court-imposed deadline,” the university said. “We have requested the RCMP’s assistance to support VIU’s enforcement of the order if participants remain after the court-ordered timeframe.”

Despite the outcome, the Palestine solidarity encampment said in an Instagram post that the students "remain steadfast" in their commitment to the Palestinian cause, their demands and their right to protest.

"...While we recognize that Canada and the western world prioritize private property over Charter rights, it is truly disappointing to see that a university, who claims to support freedom of expression, goes to such lengths to restrict protests that do not align with their colonial criterias," the students said.

The B.C. Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA), an intervener in support of the student protesters’ freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, released their own statement sharing disappointment with the outcome. 

“Freedom of expression should be protected unless there is an exceptional justification for its restriction,” said Ga Grant, BCCLA litigation staff counsel, in a statement. “Today, the court missed a critical opportunity to align the law with our Charter rights and values. While the door remains open for us to fight for an evolution of the law in the future, failure to apply these principles today continues to curtail the essential role of Charter rights in our legal landscape.”

Breaking News You Need To Know

Sign up for free account today and start receiving our exclusive newsletters.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up


Jessica Durling

About the Author: Jessica Durling

Nanaimo News Bulletin journalist covering health, wildlife and Lantzville council.
Read more